Prince Harry reveals he was targeted by press leaks after private combos with royal family the tailor caught in the middle of Kate Middleton and Meghan markle's bridesmaid dress fight is speaking out house Republican tells Kevin McCarthy to start governing for a change says she won't vote to boot ill and Omar off of.
The house Foreign Affairs committee Trump tries to intervene as Navara faces trial for defying January 6 committee King Charles May exclude Prince Harry and Meghan Markle from balcony coronation celebration breaking news I'm Aaron Burnett in Washington Prince Harry reveals he was targeted by press leaks after private.
Combos with royal family Prince Harry's new Memoir spare is set to release next week and his first interview to promote it was with Anderson Cooper on CBS mornings in a clip from their discussion the Duke of Sussex shared another difficult aspect of his relationship to the royal family he alleges that every time he.
Tries to discuss an issue with someone privately a slew of negative stories about himself and wife Meghan Markle pops up in the Press every single time I've tried to do it privately there have been briefings and leakings and planting of stories against me and my wife he told Cooper you know the family motto is never.
Complain never explain but it's just a motto he went on there's a lot of complaining and a lot of explaining being done through leaks they will feed or have a conversation with the correspondent Prince Harry explained and that correspondent will literally be.
Spoon fed information and write the story and at the bottom of it they will say that they've reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment but the whole story is Buckingham Palace commenting so when we're being told for the last six years we can't put a statement out.
To protect you but you do it for other members of the family it becomes there becomes a point when silence is betrayal Harry and Megan eventually stepped down as working members of the royal family and made a new home in the states in their new Netflix dokusaries titled.
Harry and Meghan the couple discuss how often they were being followed by the press and how miserable it was making the duchess the couple felt as though they had no support and were often used to distract from other scandals or issues with different royal family members the tailor caught in the middle of Kate.
Middleton and Meghan markle's bridesmaid dress fight is speaking out Prince Harry spilled details of Kate Middleton and Meghan markle's tense drama over bridesmaid dresses in his Memoir spare and by that I mean he dropped their literal text Exchange in case you missed this whole thing which doubtful Kate texted Megan ahead.
Of the royal wedding saying Charlotte's dress is too big too long too baggy she cried when she tried it on at home Megan then wrote back right and I told you the tailor has been standing by since 8am here at KP can you take Charlotte to have it altered as the other moms are doing.
Truly so awkward already but at another Point Megan wrote I'm not sure what else to say if the dress doesn't fit then please take Charlotte to crj he's been waiting all day and now now the tailor caught in the middle of this drama AJ Murphy is speaking out.
Mercury told the Daily Mail that he alongside three staff members worked at Kensington Palace and Windsor Castle for four days due to none of the bridesmaids dresses designed by Givenchy fitting but he wasn't around to witness any drama if anything happened in the background it didn't happen in front of me Mercury.
Explained but yes weddings are stressful at the best of times and especially one at this high level you've got to respect that they were faced with a problem like anyone gets at a wedding with last minute hitches I can understand why anybody would be upset if the dresses weren't fitting.
It's nerve-wracking I feel for them all because you wouldn't want the children to go out on a big stage in an ill-fitting dress and that's what they were he continued all six bridesmaids dresses had to be fixed and we did it I'm a royalist and I wanted to do whatever I could with my small business.
To serve the Royal Family we just got our heads down and said now we're here we've got to fix it so that on the day Britain comes off well had this book not come out no one would have known it was us but if it saved the day it saved the day and good luck to them I won't say it upsets me but in that.
Whole big event this the row is what's spoken about the most it should be the fact that they the Bridesmaids looked fabulous house Republican tells Kevin McCarthy to start governing for a change says she won't vote to boot ill and Omar off of the house Foreign Affairs committee McCarthy is set to hold a vote on.
Removing Ilan Omar from the house Foreign Affairs committee he cited Omar's previous comments on Israel as well as previous votes to do the same to Republicans but representative Victoria Sparks won't vote for the resolution and says McCarthy should start governing house Speaker Kevin McCarthy is.
Preparing to hold a floor vote in the coming weeks on removing Democratic representative Ilan Omar of Minnesota from the house committee on Foreign Affairs citing previous comments from Omar perceived as anti-semitic and what he says was a precedent set by house Democrats but at least one house Republican.
Representative Victoria Sparks of Indiana has firmly declared that she will not vote for the resolution speaker McCarthy is taking unprecedented actions this Congress to deny some committee assignments to the minority without proper due process again spart said in a statement on Tuesday as I spoke against it on the house floor.
Two years ago I will not support the charade again speaker McCarthy needs to stop bread and circuses in Congress and start governing for a change it's not the first time spartz has emerged as a Critic of McCarthy during the four days that the house voted on electing a new speaker Sparks.
Began to vote present as the roll call votes rolled on arguing that votes were wasting everyone's time in her statement on Tuesday spartz referenced by partisan votes during the previous Congress to remove Republican Representatives Marjorie Taylor green of Georgia and Paul gosar of Arizona from committees over their violent rhetoric.
Saying two wrongs do not make a right she also apparently referenced the impending removal of democratic Representatives Eric swalwell and Adam Schiff both of California from the house permanent select committee on intelligence House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries recently argued that it would be a.
Double standard for the two Democrats to be removed from the panel while Republican representative George Santos of New York gets to serve on committees despite a history of Fabrications and numerous ethics inquiries but as house Speaker McCarthy has the unilateral ability to reject jeffries's picks for any Select Committee.
But in the case of Omar's seat on the house committee on Foreign Affairs removing her will require a full vote on the house floor and McCarthy can only afford to lose a handful of votes given the Republican slim majority other Republicans have also expressed skepticism about the idea Omar apologized nearly three years ago.
For her remarks which included suggesting that support for Israel in the United States is primarily about money Trump tries to intervene as Navarro faces trial for defying January 6 committee Donald Trump is once again making a last-ditch bid to help a former aide.
Avoid prosecution for defying the January 6th Select Committee a lawyer for Trump issued a letter this week endorsing the decision by former White House adviser Peter Navarro to blow off a subpoena from the January 6th select committee by making blanket claims of executive privilege the January 23rd letter filed in federal.
Court comes less than a week before Navarro is slated to go to trial for contempt of congress for refusing to appear before the select committee last year this confirms president Trump's position that as one of his senior advisors you had an obligation to assert executive privilege on his behalf and fully comply.
With the principles of confidentiality stated above when you responded to The committee's subpoena the attorney Evan Corcoran wrote on Trump's behalf the letter appears calculated to undercut the ruling of U.S District Court Judge Amit Mehta rejecting Navarro's effort to dismiss the cases against him.
Meta noted in a 39-page opinion last week that Navarro had presented no evidence that Trump actually asserted executive privilege on his behalf even though he made explicit assertions to block the testimony of other former aides defendant has failed to come forward with any evidence to support the claimed.
Assertion of privilege Metta wrote and because the claimed assertion of executive privilege isn't proven defendant cannot avoid prosecution for contempt meta is unlikely to consider corcoran's letter sufficient to derail Navarro's trial Navarro had initially claimed in court.
Arguments that Trump told him during a private conversation to assert executive privilege before the January 6 committee but corcoran's letter makes no reference to such an assertion it's the second time Trump has made a last-second bid to disrupt the pending contempt trials for AIDS who defied the select committee.
Days before longtime allies Steve Bannon faced a criminal trial for contempt Trump took the opposite tack writing a letter to Bannon waiting any potential executive privilege and clearing the way for Bannon to testify to the committee prosecutors dismissed the Gambit as a stunt to disrupt the trial and Bannon ultimately took no steps to actually.
Comply with the select committee subpoena even after Trump's explicit permission Navarro like Bannon both claimed that they were categorically immune from appearing before the January 6 committee to discuss their involvement in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
They said their sensitive conversations with Trump were protected by executive privilege and therefore they could not be compelled by Congress to discuss them but U.S District Court Judge Carl Nichols rejected bannon's contention noting that long-standing legal precedents don't permit witnesses to defy Congressional subpoenas even over.
Assertions of executive privilege and in both cases prosecutors noted that there was no evidence Trump had asserted privilege on Bannon or Navarro's behalf
